17. How fast can commercial cells really charge?

Energy cells vs. power cells – charging rate

Belharouk et al, 2018, Electrochemical Communications – charging limits of NCM811 cathodes and graphite anodes

Bhagat et al, 2018, Electrochimica Acta – charging limits of commercial energy cell

Miller et al, 2017, SAE – charging limits of commercial power cell

In this podcast I discuss the charging rate limits for commercial electrode materials as well as commercial cells. They are faster than you may think.

16. 2 minute charge? Impossible!

Patent application

Bruce Dunn

This material can charge in 2.5 minutes, > 10,000x.

Currently commercial lithium ion batteries typically charge in 1.5 – 2 hours. ‘Fast charge’ is limited to 30 – 45 minutes and with harsh consequences on cycle life and safety. However, there are battery electrode materials which blur the capacitor/battery line. MoS2 has been claimed by professor Dunn (UCLA) to be such a “pseudocapacitor”. This podcast discusses a patent claiming a pseudocapacitor electrode material which can charge in 2.5 minutes for > 10,000x and with a capacity > 120mAh/g.

> 10,000 cycles with no capacity fade at a charge/discharge rate of 23C (which corresponds to 2.5 minute charge). Capacity is stable > 120 mAh/g.

15. Amprius: silicon anodes by CVD

Amprius grows silicon directly off current collectors by CVD

Patent

Amprius website

Yi Cui – Stanford

Growing silicon directly off current collectors (by CVD) offers a rich library of strategies to solve traditional problems associated with silicon anodes. However, it also raises a few new ones. Find out more in my latest podcast.

Silicon active material (340) is grown onto nickel silicide template (310) and may be coated by carbon or lithium conducting shell (330). The silicide template is hard rooted onto the copper current collector (320) for enhanced electron conductivity.

14. 1D Silicon anodes from Sila Nanotechnologies

Why is BMW investing in this company?

2017 Sila US9673448

Professor Gleb Yushin’s page

Sila Nanotechnology

Secondary particle of Sila’s silicon anode depicting the 1D carbon whiskers for electron conductivity and the silicon nanoparticles for lithium capacity

Anodes with silicon active materials may offer more than 2x the capacity of anodes with graphite active materials and improved rates of operation due to a low risk of lithium plating. A 1D architecture consists of ultrathin wires or whiskers as opposed to ultrathin sheets (2D). Emerging from the lab of professor Gleb Yushin, Sila Nanotechnologies focuses on such electron conductive wires (carbon based) decorated with silicon nanoparticles. This concept provides a highly porous secondary structure where the silicon particles have room to expand and contract without cracking the overall anode structure and is claimed to work well with liquid electrolyte systems. This podcast dissects a 2018 patent which claims Sila’s core silicon anode technology.

13. The magic of 2D current collectors

2D mxene light current collectors to replace heavy copper current collectors, from Gogotsi group.

Gogotsi paper on mxene current collectors

Gogotsi page at Drexel University

2D current collector on the left (sheets of d-Ti3C2Tx) and cathode (particles of LFP+CB+PVDF) on the right. Inset shows bending of such electrode.

Current collectors are the substrates on which anode and cathode active materials are deposited in a lithium ion battery. They do NOT contribute to battery energy density. Their role is to transport electrons from the location of redox reactions in the active material towards wiring tabs and through the load (cell phone or electric motor, etc). Traditionally, current collectors need high transverse electron conductivity parallel to the sheet plane as well as flexibility and high mechanical strength to allow for tight electrode winding into cells, under high tension. In addition, current collectors need to block any ion transport across the foil which would short the cell. These requirements have traditionally limited a choice of current collector materials to metallic foils such as copper and aluminum, circa 10 micron in thickness. It is desirable to reduce the weight of current collectors which currently can account for as high as 50% of electrode weight in a lithium ion cell. This podcast discusses professor Gogotsi’s invention of mxene based, 2D, light current collectors.

12. Bipolar Madness

2005 Amine: wound bipolar cells US6858345B2

2013 Nissan: non metallic bipolar current collector US8445139B2

2014 Nissan: no bubbles US8734984

2016 CEA: U shaped wind/stack hybrid US9318748

2018 CEA: copolymer, temp dependent US10044068

Monopolar (left) vs bipolar (right) battery cell design

A bipolar design solves a major problem in lithium ion batteries: fast charging. Typical commercial cells have a monopolar design which means that each current collector has either a cathode or an anode applied on either side. By contrast, a bipolar design has both the anode and cathode applied to opposite sides of the same current collector. In this podcast, I explain how this design lowers battery resistance and increases energy density. I also discuss several patents which claim solutions to some of the challenges of bipolar designs.

11. Li-ion battery separators – today’s solid electrolytes

Why “liquid” Li-ion cells are actually “semi-solid” hybrids.

Paper link

Corresponding author link

Paper discussing separator tortuosity by Gasteiger group

Voltage drop can be as high as 0.18V (losses: >15% of total energy) across a 16 micron separator if battery is operated at 5C.

Today’s “liquid cells” are in fact solid/liquid hybrids where liquid electrolytes make up only 30% to 40% of the volume between anode and cathode. Separators are the porous polymeric membranes which (electrically) insulate the anode from the cathode. They house the ionically conductive liquid electrolyte in their empty pores and govern the energy density, cycle life and safety of lithium ion cells even though they are inert components. This 2018 Nature paper discusses the role of separators as well as several critical parameters used to characterize them, such as effective conductivity, transfer coefficients, diffusion constants, porosity, tortuosity, Gurley values, permeability and others.

10. Fast Silicon anodes from Enevate

Can silicon anodes provide BOTH higher capacity AND faster rates?
Free standing, 5 micron, flexible, strong anode with >70% silicon from Enevate


Patent link

Enevate website poster

Enevate website

There is a lot of talk on the subject of fast charging in the electric vehicle world. In principle, you cannot have both high energy density AND fast charging built into the same battery. There are many reasons for this, however, the graphite anode is the main block to fast charging. Currently “power” cells with graphite anodes can charge as fast as 75% in 15 minutes while “energy” cells require >1.5 hours. Future anodes such as silicon may bring larger capacities AS WELL AS faster rates of charging. Enevate discloses how in this patent. Listen to my podcast to learn more.

9. Solid Polymer Electrolytes from Hydro-Québec

Crosslinked solid polymer electrolytes (SPE)

Patent

Epoxy (oxiranes) crosslinking with amines

Jeffamines (polyetheramines linked to amines – low temp crosslinking agents)

HydroQuebec

Karim Zaghib – director of the institute

Glycidyl methacrylate/poly(ethylene glycol) methyl methacrylate random copolymer before crosslinking with ethylenediamine.

Hydro-Québec has been a leading solid polymer electrolyte (SPE) innovation engine for more than 20 years. It has already licensed legitimate solid battery technologies to electric car manufacturers such as Bluecar and Dongshi Kingpower. While initially limited to LFP cathodes and 80C operating temperature, current SPE technology extends to high voltage NCM, NCA or LCO cathodes and can operate at a lower temperature of 40C. SPE electrolytes are also stable with lithium metal electrodes guaranteeing higher energy densities than lithium ion cells with conventional liquid electrolytes.

Cycle life of solid state batteries with SPE is governed by the electrochemical stability of the polymer during cycling. Since most such polymers are crosslinked in order to improve their mechanical and electrochemical properties, residual crosslinking agent may often remain in the SPE during battery operation. This may cause undesired side reactions and accelerate deterioration of SPE. In this patent, Hydro-Québec discloses a crosslinking strategy which improves electrochemical stability.